PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CD vs. ASST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CD vs. ASST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CD achieves a -12.88% return, which is significantly higher than ASST's -13.96% return.


CD

1D
0.93%
1M
-18.76%
6M
-25.86%
YTD
-12.88%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
-2.22%
10Y*
-25.64%

ASST

1D
-3.13%
1M
-8.76%
6M
-38.94%
YTD
-13.96%
1Y
-90.90%
3Y*
-58.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CD vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CD
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc
-12.88%-27.23%162.69%134.00%
ASST
Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock
-13.96%50.46%-84.65%-89.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CD and ASST is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CD:

$343.99M

ASST:

$1.23B

Total Revenue (TTM)

CD:

$1.67M

ASST:

$5.73M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CD:

-$1.10M

ASST:

-$7.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

CD:

-$10.65M

ASST:

-$304.63M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CD vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CD
CD Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CD Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
CD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CD Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ASST
ASST Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ASST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASST Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASST Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ASST Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASST Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CD vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CDASSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.86

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

-0.95

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

-1.12

+1.15

CD vs. ASST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CD Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the ASST Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CD and ASST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CD vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CD drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, roughly equal to the maximum ASST drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CD and ASST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CDASSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.79%

-98.78%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-89.83%

-95.98%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.83%

-97.25%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.37%

-97.84%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.04%

-90.52%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.52%

81.40%

-10.88%

Volatility

CD vs. ASST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) is 27.07%, while Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that CD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CDASSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.07%

28.87%

-1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

103.12%

80.47%

+22.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

186.24%

162.75%

+23.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

151.82%

319.99%

-168.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.12%

319.99%

-173.87%

Dividends

CD vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison

Neither CD nor ASST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CD vs. ASST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chaince Digital Holdings Inc and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00K1.00M1.50M2.00M2.50MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
466.58K
2.76M
(CD) Total Revenue
(ASST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CD and ASST have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASST has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to CD (27.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CD dropped -99.79% vs ASST's -98.78%.

CD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CD and ASST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer