CD vs. ASST
CD (Chaince Digital Holdings Inc) and ASST (Strive, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — CD in Capital Markets, ASST in Asset Management. Over the past 3 years, CD returned 14.60%/yr vs -52.67%/yr for ASST. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CD vs. ASST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CD achieves a -38.83% return, which is significantly lower than ASST's -17.41% return.
CD
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- -36.53%
- 6M
- -53.01%
- YTD
- -38.83%
- 1Y
- 12.18%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- -6.65%
- 10Y*
- -27.50%
- ALL TIME*
- -32.20%
ASST
- 1D
- 6.09%
- 1M
- 7.50%
- 6M
- -22.42%
- YTD
- -17.41%
- 1Y
- -85.21%
- 3Y*
- -52.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -67.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
ASST Strive, Inc. | $33.04M | $38.49M | $62.89M |
| $462.67K | $741.81K | $1.35M |
CD vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CD Chaince Digital Holdings Inc | -38.83% | -27.23% | 162.69% | 134.00% |
ASST Strive, Inc. | -17.41% | 50.46% | -84.65% | -89.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CD and ASST is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
CD:
$241.51M
ASST:
$1.21B
CD:
$1.67M
ASST:
$5.73M
CD:
-$1.10M
ASST:
-$7.43M
CD:
-$10.65M
ASST:
-$304.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CD vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank
CD
ASST
CD vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) and Strive, Inc. (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CD | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.90 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | -0.89 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | -1.03 | +1.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CD vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CD drawdown since its inception was -99.79%, roughly equal to the maximum ASST drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CD and ASST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CD | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.79% | -98.78% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -92.01% | -95.98% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.01% | -97.25% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.86% | -97.93% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.08% | -90.64% | +0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 73.10% | 83.04% | -9.94% |
Volatility
CD vs. ASST - Volatility Comparison
Chaince Digital Holdings Inc (CD) has a higher volatility of 26.45% compared to Strive, Inc. (ASST) at 22.42%. This indicates that CD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CD | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.45% | 22.42% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 97.73% | 76.49% | +21.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 168.79% | 146.56% | +22.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 152.01% | 317.52% | -165.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.22% | 317.52% | -171.30% |
Dividends
CD vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison
Neither CD nor ASST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CD vs. ASST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chaince Digital Holdings Inc and Strive, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CD and ASST have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CD has higher volatility (26.45%) compared to ASST (22.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CD dropped -99.79% vs ASST's -98.78%.
CD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CD and ASST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer