PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCVIX vs. FCCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCVIX vs. FCCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCVIX achieves a 24.45% return, which is significantly higher than FCCVX's 21.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CCVIX having a 12.41% annualized return and FCCVX not far behind at 11.99%.


CCVIX

1D
-1.73%
1M
3.13%
YTD
24.45%
6M
22.34%
1Y
39.65%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
12.41%

FCCVX

1D
-1.56%
1M
1.26%
YTD
21.26%
6M
19.14%
1Y
36.06%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
11.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCVIX vs. FCCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCVIX
Calamos Convertible Fund
24.45%18.83%9.71%10.61%-21.23%5.13%48.51%19.18%0.38%14.04%
FCCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C
21.26%17.04%7.28%10.24%-16.22%8.77%41.00%27.26%-2.32%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CCVIX and FCCVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2009

0.93

The correlation between CCVIX and FCCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCVIX vs. FCCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCVIX
CCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FCCVX
FCCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FCCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FCCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCVIX vs. FCCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCVIXFCCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.41

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

5.23

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.79

18.65

+1.14

CCVIX vs. FCCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the FCCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCVIX and FCCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCVIX vs. FCCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCVIX drawdown since its inception was -36.56%, which is greater than FCCVX's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCVIX and FCCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCVIXFCCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.56%

-25.13%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-7.21%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-18.98%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.33%

-24.66%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.33%

-25.13%

-2.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.88%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-6.18%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.02%

+0.08%

Volatility

CCVIX vs. FCCVX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C (FCCVX) have volatilities of 6.39% and 6.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCVIXFCCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

6.48%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

12.98%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

15.90%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.15%

13.69%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

13.74%

-0.75%

CCVIX vs. FCCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCVIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FCCVX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCVIX vs. FCCVX - Dividend Comparison

CCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, less than FCCVX's 8.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCVIX
Calamos Convertible Fund
8.14%10.25%1.31%1.87%0.60%13.59%6.56%1.00%14.47%3.90%2.84%4.68%
FCCVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class C
8.30%10.47%1.32%1.12%2.62%19.63%9.96%2.31%8.75%3.35%3.85%9.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CCVIX and FCCVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCCVX has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to CCVIX (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCVIX dropped -36.56% vs FCCVX's -25.13%.

CCVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCVIX and FCCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer