CCVIX vs. CVGRX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CCVIX (Calamos Convertible Fund) and CVGRX (Calamos Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - CCVIX is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund managed by Calamos, while CVGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Calamos. Over the past 10 years, CCVIX returned 12.41%/yr vs 14.72%/yr for CVGRX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CCVIX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for CVGRX.

Performance

CCVIX vs. CVGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCVIX achieves a 24.45% return, which is significantly higher than CVGRX's 4.67% return. Over the past 10 years, CCVIX has underperformed CVGRX with an annualized return of 12.41%, while CVGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.

CCVIX

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: 3.13%
• YTD: 24.45%
• 6M: 22.34%
• 1Y: 39.65%
• 3Y*: 19.54%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: 12.41%

CVGRX

• 1D: -2.17%
• 1M: -2.69%
• YTD: 4.67%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 17.17%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: 14.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCVIX vs. CVGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCVIX Calamos Convertible Fund	24.45%	18.83%	9.71%	10.61%	-21.23%	5.13%	48.51%	19.18%	0.38%	14.04%
CVGRX Calamos Growth Fund	4.67%	16.08%	32.32%	37.64%	-33.33%	23.06%	32.97%	31.11%	-6.14%	26.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CCVIX and CVGRX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 1990	0.86

The correlation between CCVIX and CVGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (3 years) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CCVIX vs. CVGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCVIX

CCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
CCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CVGRX

CVGRX Risk / Return Rank: 18
CVGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CVGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CVGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CVGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
CVGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCVIX vs. CVGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) and Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCVIX	CVGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	1.09	+1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.39	1.54	+1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.20	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.39	1.20	+4.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.79	4.37	+15.42

CCVIX vs. CVGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the CVGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCVIX and CVGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCVIX vs. CVGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCVIX drawdown since its inception was -36.56%, smaller than the maximum CVGRX drawdown of -61.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCVIX and CVGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCVIX	CVGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.56%	-61.65%	+25.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.71%	-16.00%	+8.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.80%	-23.81%	+9.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.33%	-37.43%	+10.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.33%	-37.43%	+10.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.93%	-5.91%	+3.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.88%	-11.49%	+5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	4.39%	-2.29%

Volatility

CCVIX vs. CVGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) is 6.39%, while Calamos Growth Fund (CVGRX) has a volatility of 7.32%. This indicates that CCVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCVIX	CVGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.39%	7.32%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.12%	14.18%	-1.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.84%	17.72%	-1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.15%	22.00%	-8.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.99%	21.67%	-8.68%

CCVIX vs. CVGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCVIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CVGRX's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCVIX vs. CVGRX - Dividend Comparison

CCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, less than CVGRX's 8.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCVIX Calamos Convertible Fund	8.14%	10.25%	1.31%	1.87%	0.60%	13.59%	6.56%	1.00%	14.47%	3.90%	2.84%	4.68%
CVGRX Calamos Growth Fund	8.42%	8.81%	6.66%	4.48%	0.00%	12.17%	11.25%	9.71%	16.86%	13.75%	4.12%	35.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCVIX and CVGRX in my portfolio?

CCVIX and CVGRX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCVIX or CVGRX?

CVGRX has higher volatility (7.32%) compared to CCVIX (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCVIX dropped -36.56% vs CVGRX's -61.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.