CCVIX vs. CSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ).
CCVIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Jun 21, 1985. CSQ is an actively managed fund by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 26, 2004.
Performance
CCVIX vs. CSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCVIX vs. CSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCVIX Calamos Convertible Fund | 0.22% | 18.83% | 9.71% | 10.61% | -21.23% | 5.13% | 48.51% | 19.18% | 0.38% | 14.04% |
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | -9.64% | 16.25% | 28.11% | 20.80% | -24.26% | 30.77% | 26.22% | 38.62% | -4.89% | 27.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCVIX achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than CSQ's -9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CCVIX has underperformed CSQ with an annualized return of 10.06%, while CSQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.80% annualized return.
CCVIX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 23.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
CSQ
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -9.32%
- YTD
- -9.64%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- 13.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCVIX vs. CSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCVIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CSQ's 2.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCVIX vs. CSQ — Risk / Return Rank
CCVIX
CSQ
CCVIX vs. CSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCVIX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 0.65 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 1.01 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.16 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 0.83 | +1.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.65 | 3.29 | +6.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCVIX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 0.65 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.38 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.65 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.39 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCVIX and CSQ is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CCVIX vs. CSQ - Dividend Comparison
CCVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.23%, more than CSQ's 7.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCVIX Calamos Convertible Fund | 10.23% | 10.25% | 1.31% | 1.87% | 0.60% | 13.59% | 6.56% | 1.00% | 14.47% | 3.90% | 2.84% | 4.68% |
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | 7.54% | 6.51% | 6.95% | 8.27% | 9.17% | 6.38% | 7.03% | 7.14% | 9.35% | 8.20% | 9.64% | 10.00% |
Drawdowns
CCVIX vs. CSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCVIX drawdown since its inception was -36.56%, smaller than the maximum CSQ drawdown of -67.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCVIX and CSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCVIX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.56% | -67.17% | +30.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.90% | -15.59% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.33% | -33.09% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.33% | -48.21% | +20.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.71% | -12.07% | +4.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.91% | -9.40% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 3.94% | -1.73% |
Volatility
CCVIX vs. CSQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) is 6.17%, while Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that CCVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCVIX | CSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.17% | 6.85% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.88% | 11.54% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 21.12% | -5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 20.00% | -7.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 22.93% | -10.24% |