PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCUP vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCUP vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CCUP having a -20.97% return and TSLG slightly higher at -20.82%.


CCUP

1D
-20.05%
1M
-47.47%
YTD
-20.97%
6M
-36.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
-0.14%
1M
13.71%
YTD
-20.82%
6M
-21.35%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCUP vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CCUP
T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF
-20.97%-83.16%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.82%54.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CCUP and TSLG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCUP vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCUP

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCUP vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCUP vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCUPTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

-0.34

-0.12

Drawdowns

CCUP vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCUP drawdown since its inception was -93.74%, which is greater than TSLG's maximum drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCUP and TSLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCUPTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.74%

-82.86%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.98%

-60.00%

-26.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.18%

-58.73%

-10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.63%

Volatility

CCUP vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCUPTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

197.62%

92.53%

+105.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

197.62%

115.31%

+82.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

197.62%

115.31%

+82.31%

CCUP vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCUP vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

CCUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCUP and TSLG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 0.00% for CCUP.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CCUP and 0.75% for TSLG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCUP and TSLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer