PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCUP vs. SBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCUP vs. SBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCUP achieves a -20.97% return, which is significantly lower than SBU's 21.72% return.


CCUP

1D
-20.05%
1M
-47.47%
YTD
-20.97%
6M
-36.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBU

1D
0.85%
1M
-16.51%
YTD
21.72%
6M
11.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCUP vs. SBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CCUP and SBU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCUP vs. SBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP) and Leverage Shares 2X Long SBUX Daily ETF (SBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCUP vs. SBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCUPSBUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

0.71

-1.17

Drawdowns

CCUP vs. SBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCUP drawdown since its inception was -93.74%, which is greater than SBU's maximum drawdown of -28.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCUP and SBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCUPSBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.74%

-28.10%

-65.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.98%

-20.00%

-66.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.18%

-6.56%

-62.62%

Volatility

CCUP vs. SBU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCUPSBUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

197.62%

59.78%

+137.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

197.62%

59.78%

+137.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

197.62%

59.78%

+137.84%

CCUP vs. SBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SBU's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCUP vs. SBU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCUP nor SBU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CCUP and SBU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.

CCUP and SBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CCUP and 0.75% for SBU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCUP and SBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer