CCUP vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCUP (T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CCUP is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.

Performance

CCUP vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCUP achieves a -20.97% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.

CCUP

• 1D: -20.05%
• 1M: -47.47%
• YTD: -20.97%
• 6M: -36.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 7.14%
• 1M: 201.84%
• YTD: 842.68%
• 6M: 558.01%
• 1Y: 1,215.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCUP vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCUP T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF	-20.97%	-83.16%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	842.68%	-2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CCUP and MVLL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	0.22

Return for Risk

CCUP vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCUP vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCUP	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	9.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.47	3.33	-3.80

Drawdowns

CCUP vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCUP drawdown since its inception was -93.74%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCUP and MVLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCUP	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.74%	-59.02%	-34.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-48.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.98%	0.00%	-86.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.18%	-22.42%	-46.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	23.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCUP	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	60.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	96.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	197.62%	133.11%	+64.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	197.62%	139.63%	+57.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	197.62%	139.63%	+57.99%

CCUP vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CCUP and MVLL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

Dividends

CCUP vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCUP nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCUP and MVLL in my portfolio?

CCUP and MVLL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CCUP or MVLL?

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCUP or MVLL?

CCUP and MVLL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCUP or MVLL?

CCUP and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CCUP and MVLL?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares.