PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCUP vs. MSTU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCUP vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCUP achieves a -20.97% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -54.27% return.


CCUP

1D
-20.05%
1M
-47.47%
YTD
-20.97%
6M
-36.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTU

1D
-14.03%
1M
-55.66%
YTD
-54.27%
6M
-71.83%
1Y
-95.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCUP vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CCUP
T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF
-20.97%-83.16%
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
-54.27%-89.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CCUP and MSTU is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCUP vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCUP

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCUP vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCUP vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCUPMSTUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

-0.40

-0.07

Drawdowns

CCUP vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCUP drawdown since its inception was -93.74%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTU drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCUP and MSTU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCUPMSTUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.74%

-98.58%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.98%

-98.52%

+11.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.18%

-71.94%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

75.17%

Volatility

CCUP vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCUPMSTUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

111.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

197.62%

138.62%

+59.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

197.62%

169.06%

+28.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

197.62%

169.06%

+28.56%

CCUP vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCUP vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCUP nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CCUP and MSTU have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSTU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSTU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.

CCUP and MSTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CCUP and 1.05% for MSTU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCUP and MSTU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer