CCUP vs. MUU
CCUP (T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CCUP is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCUP charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.
Performance
CCUP vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCUP
- 1D
- -10.16%
- 1M
- -58.71%
- YTD
- -47.00%
- 6M
- -51.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUU
- 1D
- -26.28%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCUP vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CCUP T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF | -18.44% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCUP and MUU is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCUP vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRCL Daily Target ETF (CCUP) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCUP vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCUP drawdown since its inception was -93.74%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCUP and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCUP | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.74% | -26.28% | -67.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.27% | -26.28% | -64.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.09% | -10.19% | -59.90% |
Volatility
CCUP vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCUP | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 194.61% | 295.32% | -100.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 194.61% | 295.32% | -100.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 194.61% | 295.32% | -100.71% |
CCUP vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCUP has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCUP vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
Neither CCUP nor MUU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCUP and MUU have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CCUP.
CCUP and MUU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CCUP and 1.01% for MUU.
Find the right allocation for CCUP and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer