CCSO vs. FLDZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CCSO (Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF) and FLDZ (RiverNorth Patriot ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CCSO returned 7.88%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for FLDZ. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CCSO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FLDZ.

Performance

CCSO vs. FLDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSO achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than FLDZ's 3.40% return.

CCSO

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -3.67%
• 6M: -0.85%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 1Y: 12.92%
• 3Y*: 7.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.05%

FLDZ

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -4.86%
• 6M: 1.59%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 1Y: 6.02%
• 3Y*: 9.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	$68.20K	$82.96K	$97.75K
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	$3.19K	$2.29K	$1.72K

CCSO vs. FLDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	6.31%	21.79%	3.89%	14.58%	-12.52%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	3.40%	6.66%	15.99%	12.15%	-2.66%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSO and FLDZ is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022	0.76

The correlation between CCSO and FLDZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CCSO vs. FLDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CCSO	FLDZ
Industrials	52.2%	12.3%
Basic Materials	15.2%	1.5%
Technology	10.0%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	14.6%
Utilities	6.9%	11.6%
Energy	6.4%	10.3%
Financial Services	0.5%	15.5%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	4.7%
Communication Services	-	4.2%
Healthcare	-	13.2%
Real Estate	-	8.7%

Return for Risk

CCSO vs. FLDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCSO

CCSO Risk / Return Rank: 24
CCSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CCSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
CCSO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CCSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CCSO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FLDZ

FLDZ Risk / Return Rank: 21
FLDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FLDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FLDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FLDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FLDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCSO vs. FLDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) and RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCSO	FLDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	0.38	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	0.61	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.08	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	0.66	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.18	2.09	+0.09

CCSO vs. FLDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSO Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the FLDZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSO and FLDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCSO vs. FLDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSO drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, which is greater than FLDZ's maximum drawdown of -19.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSO and FLDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSO	FLDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.69%	-19.54%	-4.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.75%	-7.78%	-6.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.82%	-17.43%	-5.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.82%	-4.86%	-7.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.26%	-5.85%	-1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.17%	2.45%	+2.72%

Volatility

CCSO vs. FLDZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) is 6.20%, while RiverNorth Patriot ETF (FLDZ) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that CCSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSO	FLDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	7.82%	-1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.11%	10.62%	+7.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.74%	13.39%	+9.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.28%	17.04%	+6.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.28%	17.04%	+6.24%

CCSO vs. FLDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FLDZ's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCSO vs. FLDZ - Dividend Comparison

CCSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than FLDZ's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	0.60%	0.63%	0.53%	0.80%	0.24%
FLDZ RiverNorth Patriot ETF	1.49%	1.54%	1.17%	1.39%	1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSO and FLDZ in my portfolio?

CCSO and FLDZ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSO or FLDZ?

FLDZ has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to CCSO (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSO dropped -23.69% vs FLDZ's -19.54%.

Which ETF is better, CCSO or FLDZ?

On 3-year performance, FLDZ leads with 9.54% vs 7.88% for CCSO. On fees, CCSO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CCSO has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CCSO or FLDZ?

Over the 3-year period, FLDZ has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCSO or FLDZ?

CCSO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCSO or FLDZ?

FLDZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.60% for CCSO.

What is the main difference between CCSO and FLDZ?

They also come from different issuers: Carbon Collective and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CCSO and 0.77% for FLDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.