CCSMX vs. NEEGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CCSMX (Conestoga SMid Cap Fund) and NEEGX (Needham Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CCSMX returned 8.93%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for NEEGX. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CCSMX charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for NEEGX.

Performance

CCSMX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSMX achieves a -7.81% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 34.50% return. Over the past 10 years, CCSMX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 8.93%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.

CCSMX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -4.27%
• 6M: -7.85%
• YTD: -7.81%
• 1Y: -11.03%
• 3Y*: 0.28%
• 5Y*: -3.11%
• 10Y*: 8.93%
• ALL TIME*: 6.78%

NEEGX

• 1D: 5.86%
• 1M: -10.02%
• 6M: 17.12%
• YTD: 34.50%
• 1Y: 51.33%
• 3Y*: 16.90%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: 14.06%
• ALL TIME*: 12.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

CCSMX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	-7.81%	-5.91%	10.44%	25.77%	-29.47%	15.26%	28.44%	33.48%	-0.09%	34.11%
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	34.50%	8.76%	14.45%	26.85%	-33.57%	27.63%	41.73%	42.33%	-10.56%	8.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSMX and NEEGX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2014	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between CCSMX and NEEGX has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

CCSMX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CCSMX

CCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 1
CCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
CCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

NEEGX

NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 57
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CCSMX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCSMX	NEEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	1.42	-2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.02	1.93	-2.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.24	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	2.00	-2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	8.32	-9.61

CCSMX vs. NEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSMX Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the NEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSMX and NEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCSMX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSMX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum NEEGX drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSMX and NEEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSMX	NEEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.34%	-53.60%	+16.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.40%	-23.15%	+4.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.00%	-38.66%	+13.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.34%	-43.35%	+6.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.34%	-43.35%	+6.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.19%	-18.65%	-2.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.34%	-10.88%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.89%	5.68%	+4.21%

Volatility

CCSMX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX) is 4.75%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that CCSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSMX	NEEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	12.98%	-8.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.37%	26.85%	-14.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	32.47%	-15.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.61%	29.42%	-8.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.37%	25.90%	-5.53%

CCSMX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCSMX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison

CCSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than NEEGX's 5.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	2.36%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	1.04%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund	5.63%	7.57%	3.92%	0.00%	1.78%	6.92%	5.73%	11.31%	17.79%	9.70%	4.22%	6.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSMX and NEEGX in my portfolio?

CCSMX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSMX or NEEGX?

NEEGX has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to CCSMX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSMX dropped -37.34% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.