CCSMX vs. BQMGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX).
CCSMX is managed by Conestoga Capital Advisors. It was launched on Jan 21, 2014. BQMGX is managed by Bright Rock. It was launched on May 26, 2010.
Performance
CCSMX vs. BQMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCSMX vs. BQMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund | -10.22% | -5.91% | 10.44% | 25.77% | -29.47% | 15.26% | 28.44% | 33.48% | -0.09% | 34.11% |
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund | -5.31% | -0.29% | 14.16% | 13.00% | -19.44% | 23.02% | 19.62% | 32.05% | -6.68% | 22.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCSMX achieves a -10.22% return, which is significantly lower than BQMGX's -5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CCSMX has outperformed BQMGX with an annualized return of 9.52%, while BQMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.
CCSMX
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -12.41%
- 1Y
- -10.82%
- 3Y*
- 2.26%
- 5Y*
- -1.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
BQMGX
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- -5.31%
- 6M
- -7.79%
- 1Y
- -1.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCSMX vs. BQMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCSMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BQMGX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCSMX vs. BQMGX — Risk / Return Rank
CCSMX
BQMGX
CCSMX vs. BQMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCSMX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | -0.09 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | -0.01 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.00 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.05 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | -0.14 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCSMX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | -0.09 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.20 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.50 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCSMX and BQMGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CCSMX vs. BQMGX - Dividend Comparison
CCSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than BQMGX's 4.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund | 2.43% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 1.04% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund | 4.35% | 4.12% | 5.99% | 0.00% | 5.90% | 8.05% | 5.27% | 3.50% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.07% | 5.80% |
Drawdowns
CCSMX vs. BQMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCSMX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, roughly equal to the maximum BQMGX drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSMX and BQMGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCSMX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -36.05% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.40% | -11.62% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.34% | -25.92% | -11.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.34% | -36.05% | -1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.26% | -11.07% | -12.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.07% | -5.83% | -4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.33% | 3.85% | +2.48% |
Volatility
CCSMX vs. BQMGX - Volatility Comparison
Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) at 4.65%. This indicates that CCSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BQMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCSMX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 4.65% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 9.05% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 15.98% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 16.84% | +3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 17.97% | +2.40% |