CCSB vs. CCSO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCSB (Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF) and CCSO (Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCSB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Carbon Collective, while CCSO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Carbon Collective. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CCSB returned 2.94% vs 36.31% for CCSO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCSB charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CCSO.

Performance

CCSB vs. CCSO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) and Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCSB achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than CCSO's 20.40% return.

CCSB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 2.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCSO

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 4.07%
• YTD: 20.40%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 36.31%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCSB vs. CCSO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CCSB Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF	0.92%	4.37%	4.17%
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	20.40%	21.79%	8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CCSB and CCSO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2024	0.20

Return for Risk

CCSB vs. CCSO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCSB

CCSB Risk / Return Rank: 13
CCSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CCSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CCSB Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CCSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CCSB Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CCSO

CCSO Risk / Return Rank: 52
CCSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
CCSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CCSO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CCSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
CCSO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCSB vs. CCSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) and Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCSB	CCSO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	1.71	-1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.37	2.36	-1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.29	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	3.14	-2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	9.35	-9.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCSB vs. CCSO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCSB Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the CCSO Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCSB and CCSO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCSB	CCSO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	1.71	-1.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.54	-0.21

Drawdowns

CCSB vs. CCSO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCSB drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum CCSO drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCSB and CCSO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCSB	CCSO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-23.69%	+8.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.95%	-11.62%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.42%	-1.27%	-10.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.35%	-7.01%	+2.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.35%	3.89%	+6.46%

Volatility

CCSB vs. CCSO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) is 1.06%, while Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF (CCSO) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that CCSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCSB	CCSO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	7.18%	-6.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.20%	16.47%	-11.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.20%	21.40%	-2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.43%	23.18%	-9.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.43%	23.18%	-9.75%

CCSB vs. CCSO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCSB has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than CCSO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCSB vs. CCSO - Dividend Comparison

CCSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than CCSO's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CCSB Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF	4.61%	4.79%	3.16%	0.00%	0.00%
CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF	0.53%	0.63%	0.53%	0.80%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCSB and CCSO in my portfolio?

CCSB and CCSO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCSB or CCSO?

CCSO has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to CCSB (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCSB dropped -14.95% vs CCSO's -23.69%.

Which ETF is better, CCSB or CCSO?

On 1-year performance, CCSO leads with 36.31% vs 2.94% for CCSB. On fees, CCSO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CCSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CCSB or CCSO?

Over the 1-year period, CCSO has performed better with a 36.31% return vs 2.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCSB or CCSO?

CCSO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for CCSB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCSB or CCSO?

CCSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.53% for CCSO.

What is the main difference between CCSB and CCSO?

CCSB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CCSO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for CCSB and 0.35% for CCSO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.