PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRV vs. ZSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRV vs. ZSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CCRV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZSC

1D
0.00%
1M
1.61%
YTD
10.17%
6M
15.71%
1Y
36.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRV vs. ZSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%-0.05%5.74%-1.82%
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
10.17%28.43%-14.39%-10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRV and ZSC is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2023

0.13

The correlation between CCRV and ZSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRV vs. ZSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRV

ZSC
ZSC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ZSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRV vs. ZSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCRV vs. ZSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCRVZSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

Drawdowns

CCRV vs. ZSC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRVZSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

Volatility

CCRV vs. ZSC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRVZSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.24%

CCRV vs. ZSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZSC's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRV vs. ZSC - Dividend Comparison

CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CCRV
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%4.43%7.26%33.27%26.22%
ZSC
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund
1.59%1.75%2.18%1.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCRV and ZSC have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CCRV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CCRV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ZSC.

ZSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.59% for ZSC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRV and ZSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer