CCRV vs. ZSC
CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and ZSC (USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. CCRV is passively managed, while ZSC is actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ZSC.
Performance
CCRV vs. ZSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZSC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 15.71%
- 1Y
- 36.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCRV vs. ZSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -0.05% | 5.74% | -1.82% |
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund | 10.17% | 28.43% | -14.39% | -10.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRV and ZSC is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2023 | 0.13 |
The correlation between CCRV and ZSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRV vs. ZSC — Risk / Return Rank
CCRV
ZSC
CCRV vs. ZSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCRV | ZSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.24 | — |
Drawdowns
CCRV vs. ZSC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRV | ZSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -26.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.09% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -14.76% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
CCRV vs. ZSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRV | ZSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.68% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 12.24% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 12.24% | — |
CCRV vs. ZSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ZSC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCRV vs. ZSC - Dividend Comparison
CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% |
ZSC USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund | 1.59% | 1.75% | 2.18% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRV and ZSC have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCRV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCRV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ZSC.
ZSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.59% for ZSC.
Find the right allocation for CCRV and ZSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer