CCRV vs. HYMU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and HYMU (BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CCRV is a Commodities fund tracking the CCRV-US - ICE BofA Commodity Enhanced Carry Index, while HYMU is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by BlackRock. CCRV is passively managed, while HYMU is actively managed. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYMU.

Performance

CCRV vs. HYMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CCRV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HYMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRV vs. HYMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%
HYMU BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

CCRV vs. HYMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF (HYMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CCRV	HYMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	0.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCRV	HYMU	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	0.00%	—

CCRV vs. HYMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HYMU's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCRV vs. HYMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCRV nor HYMU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%	4.43%	7.26%	33.27%	26.22%
HYMU BlackRock High Yield Muni Income Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, CCRV or HYMU?

On fees, HYMU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CCRV or HYMU?

HYMU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CCRV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CCRV or HYMU?

CCRV and HYMU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CCRV and HYMU?

CCRV is categorized as Commodities, while HYMU is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.35% for HYMU.