CCRV vs. FTGC
CCRV (iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. CCRV is passively managed, while FTGC is actively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CCRV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.
Performance
CCRV vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CCRV
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FTGC
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 20.66%
- YTD
- 26.16%
- 1Y
- 38.44%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.08M | $14.32M | $23.26M |
CCRV vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | -0.05% | 5.74% | 5.47% | 19.91% | 33.78% | 7.16% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 26.16% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 27.95% | 11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRV and FTGC is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CCRV and FTGC has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCRV vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
CCRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTGC
CCRV vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCRV | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCRV vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRV | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -59.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.39% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -27.16% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.76% | — |
Volatility
CCRV vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCRV | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 15.89% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 15.71% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 14.74% | — |
CCRV vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCRV vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
CCRV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRV iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.43% | 7.26% | 33.27% | 26.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.36% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCRV and FTGC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCRV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCRV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 0.00% for CCRV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CCRV and 0.95% for FTGC.
Find the right allocation for CCRV and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer