PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRSX vs. RYMEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRSX vs. RYMEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCRSX achieves a 26.97% return, which is significantly lower than RYMEX's 39.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRSX has underperformed RYMEX with an annualized return of 6.01%, while RYMEX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.34% annualized return.


CCRSX

1D
1.21%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
26.97%
6M
26.90%
1Y
38.98%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
6.01%

RYMEX

1D
2.08%
1M
-4.34%
YTD
39.35%
6M
38.77%
1Y
48.14%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
7.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRSX vs. RYMEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
26.97%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%28.00%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%
RYMEX
Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund
39.35%4.70%8.24%-6.14%23.72%39.03%-22.99%15.48%-14.96%4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRSX and RYMEX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2006

0.81

The correlation between CCRSX and RYMEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRSX vs. RYMEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

RYMEX
RYMEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RYMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRSX vs. RYMEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCRSXRYMEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

2.16

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

2.76

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.38

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

5.25

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.63

13.52

+1.11

CCRSX vs. RYMEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCRSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the RYMEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCRSX and RYMEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCRSXRYMEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.16

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.65

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.33

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.14

+0.13

Drawdowns

CCRSX vs. RYMEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCRSX drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, roughly equal to the maximum RYMEX drawdown of -91.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRSX and RYMEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRSXRYMEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.56%

-91.81%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-9.64%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.56%

-14.91%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.30%

-30.45%

-52.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.30%

-59.20%

-24.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.09%

-65.95%

+25.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.08%

-66.07%

+14.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.74%

-0.96%

Volatility

CCRSX vs. RYMEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) is 5.30%, while Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX) has a volatility of 8.26%. This indicates that CCRSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRSXRYMEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

8.26%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

21.43%

-7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

23.99%

-7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

225.85%

22.82%

+203.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

159.90%

22.32%

+137.58%

CCRSX vs. RYMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RYMEX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRSX vs. RYMEX - Dividend Comparison

CCRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.92%, more than RYMEX's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
10.92%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%
RYMEX
Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund
1.71%2.38%0.00%4.98%17.15%2.97%109.50%0.74%44.23%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCRSX and RYMEX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYMEX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to CCRSX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCRSX dropped -93.56% vs RYMEX's -91.81%.

CCRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRSX and RYMEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer