CCRSX vs. BRCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX).
CCRSX is managed by Credit Suisse. It was launched on Feb 27, 2006. BRCAX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010.
Performance
CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRSX Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio | 22.65% | 15.37% | 4.86% | -8.88% | 15.71% | 28.00% | -1.49% | 6.69% | -11.63% | -7.99% |
BRCAX Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 27.94% | 18.41% | 5.47% | -3.44% | 7.77% | 19.18% | 7.75% | 4.20% | -12.18% | 4.49% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCRSX achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly lower than BRCAX's 27.94% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRSX has underperformed BRCAX with an annualized return of 6.75%, while BRCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.46% annualized return.
CCRSX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 10.19%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 29.48%
- 1Y
- 29.55%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 6.75%
BRCAX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 11.88%
- YTD
- 27.94%
- 6M
- 36.77%
- 1Y
- 42.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCRSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BRCAX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCRSX vs. BRCAX — Risk / Return Rank
CCRSX
BRCAX
CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCRSX | BRCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 2.58 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.36 | 3.11 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.48 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 4.74 | -1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 15.98 | -6.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCRSX | BRCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 2.58 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.85 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.60 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.16 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCRSX and BRCAX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Dividend Comparison
CCRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.30%, more than BRCAX's 10.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCRSX Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio | 11.30% | 3.98% | 2.95% | 26.59% | 18.97% | 4.82% | 5.51% | 0.86% | 2.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BRCAX Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 10.95% | 14.02% | 4.85% | 3.80% | 9.98% | 16.92% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 2.58% |
Drawdowns
CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCRSX drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, which is greater than BRCAX's maximum drawdown of -60.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRSX and BRCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCRSX | BRCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.56% | -60.98% | -32.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -9.22% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.30% | -20.66% | -62.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.30% | -38.44% | -44.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.13% | -0.12% | -42.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.17% | -28.81% | -22.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.74% | +0.63% |
Volatility
CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) have volatilities of 7.10% and 7.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCRSX | BRCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 7.20% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 14.88% | -1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 17.16% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 225.84% | 15.64% | +210.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.86% | 14.27% | +145.59% |