PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRSX vs. BRCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCRSX achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly lower than BRCAX's 20.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRSX has outperformed BRCAX with an annualized return of 25.76%, while BRCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.60% annualized return.


CCRSX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-8.99%
YTD
17.09%
6M
15.64%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
57.50%
10Y*
25.76%

BRCAX

1D
-0.76%
1M
-10.26%
YTD
20.15%
6M
19.24%
1Y
33.60%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
6.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
17.09%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%667.99%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
20.15%18.41%5.47%-3.44%7.77%19.18%7.75%4.20%-12.18%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRSX and BRCAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010

0.86

The correlation between CCRSX and BRCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRSX vs. BRCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BRCAX
BRCAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BRCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BRCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCRSXBRCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.40

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.48

10.21

-2.74

CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCRSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the BRCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCRSX and BRCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCRSX drawdown since its inception was -78.02%, which is greater than BRCAX's maximum drawdown of -60.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRSX and BRCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRSXBRCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.02%

-60.98%

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.76%

-13.71%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

-13.71%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.53%

-20.66%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.73%

-38.44%

+1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.76%

-13.71%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.24%

-28.43%

-12.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.27%

0.00%

Volatility

CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) is 3.87%, while Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (BRCAX) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that CCRSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRSXBRCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

4.52%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

15.87%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.60%

17.77%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

222.80%

15.72%

+207.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

157.73%

14.35%

+143.38%

CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BRCAX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRSX vs. BRCAX - Dividend Comparison

CCRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.84%, more than BRCAX's 11.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BRCAX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Commodity Strategy Fund Class A
11.66%14.02%4.85%3.80%9.98%16.92%0.00%0.89%0.17%0.00%2.58%
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
11.84%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CCRSX and BRCAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BRCAX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to CCRSX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCRSX dropped -78.02% vs BRCAX's -60.98%.

BRCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRSX and BRCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer