PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCRSX vs. ARCNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCRSX vs. ARCNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCRSX achieves a 27.42% return, which is significantly higher than ARCNX's 21.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CCRSX has underperformed ARCNX with an annualized return of 6.04%, while ARCNX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.02% annualized return.


CCRSX

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
27.42%
6M
26.84%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
11.72%
10Y*
6.04%

ARCNX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
21.24%
6M
23.89%
1Y
40.32%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
15.00%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCRSX vs. ARCNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
27.42%15.37%4.86%-8.88%15.71%28.00%-1.49%6.69%-11.63%-7.99%
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
21.24%20.76%7.19%-0.50%20.97%39.48%8.11%17.68%-17.83%10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CCRSX and ARCNX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2012

0.86

The correlation between CCRSX and ARCNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCRSX vs. ARCNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCRSX
CCRSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CCRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CCRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ARCNX
ARCNX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ARCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ARCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCRSX vs. ARCNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) and AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCRSXARCNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

2.86

-0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

3.58

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.51

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

5.00

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.18

17.67

-3.49

CCRSX vs. ARCNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCRSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the ARCNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCRSX and ARCNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCRSXARCNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.86

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.79

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.69

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.30

-0.31

Drawdowns

CCRSX vs. ARCNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCRSX drawdown since its inception was -93.56%, which is greater than ARCNX's maximum drawdown of -55.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCRSX and ARCNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCRSXARCNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.56%

-55.17%

-38.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-8.28%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.56%

-13.65%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.30%

-20.30%

-63.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.30%

-32.80%

-50.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.88%

-4.11%

-35.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.08%

-25.96%

-25.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.34%

+0.45%

Volatility

CCRSX vs. ARCNX - Volatility Comparison

Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio (CCRSX) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N (ARCNX) at 4.93%. This indicates that CCRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCRSXARCNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

4.93%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.26%

12.68%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

15.00%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

225.85%

19.05%

+206.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

159.90%

17.44%

+142.46%

CCRSX vs. ARCNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCRSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ARCNX's 1.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCRSX vs. ARCNX - Dividend Comparison

CCRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, less than ARCNX's 11.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ARCNX
AQR Risk-Balanced Commodities Strategy Fund Class N
11.19%13.57%1.89%7.45%9.45%18.31%0.09%4.98%0.29%0.01%4.69%
CCRSX
Credit Suisse Trust Commodity Return Strategy Portfolio
10.88%3.98%2.95%26.59%18.97%4.82%5.51%0.86%2.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCRSX and ARCNX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCRSX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to ARCNX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCRSX dropped -93.56% vs ARCNX's -55.17%.

ARCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCRSX and ARCNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer