PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCOYX vs. FIKHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCOYX vs. FIKHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CCOYX

1D
1.95%
1M
11.58%
YTD
53.24%
6M
51.40%
1Y
123.10%
3Y*
46.35%
5Y*
26.14%
10Y*

FIKHX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCOYX vs. FIKHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CCOYX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class
53.24%37.79%27.11%44.77%-30.92%39.45%44.92%54.68%-11.68%
FIKHX
Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z
0.00%24.77%35.52%59.89%-35.93%27.74%64.56%51.18%-17.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CCOYX and FIKHX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between CCOYX and FIKHX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCOYX vs. FIKHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCOYX
CCOYX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CCOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKHX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCOYX vs. FIKHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z (FIKHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCOYXFIKHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

39.02

CCOYX vs. FIKHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCOYXFIKHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

Drawdowns

CCOYX vs. FIKHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCOYXFIKHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

Volatility

CCOYX vs. FIKHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCOYXFIKHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

CCOYX vs. FIKHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCOYX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKHX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCOYX vs. FIKHX - Dividend Comparison

CCOYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, less than FIKHX's 9.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCOYX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class
5.27%8.08%12.32%4.60%8.17%10.62%9.52%10.61%11.42%10.60%
FIKHX
Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class Z
9.85%9.85%7.33%3.86%3.32%11.52%7.42%2.64%22.38%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCOYX and FIKHX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCOYX and FIKHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer