CCOM.TO vs. PINC.TO
CCOM.TO (CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units) and PINC.TO (Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CCOM.TO is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index, while PINC.TO is a fund fund. Over the past 3 years, CCOM.TO returned 6.60%/yr vs 15.95%/yr for PINC.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCOM.TO vs. PINC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CCOM.TO having a 14.12% return and PINC.TO slightly lower at 13.46%.
CCOM.TO
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 14.12%
- 6M
- 13.88%
- 1Y
- 21.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PINC.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 13.46%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- —
CCOM.TO vs. PINC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 14.12% | 6.96% | 5.90% | -2.46% | 1.40% |
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund | 13.46% | 14.41% | 17.01% | 5.89% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOM.TO and PINC.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2022 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCOM.TO vs. PINC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CCOM.TO
PINC.TO
CCOM.TO vs. PINC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) and Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCOM.TO | PINC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.75 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.75 | 6.48 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.22 | 24.84 | -10.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCOM.TO | PINC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 3.59 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.62 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
CCOM.TO vs. PINC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOM.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum PINC.TO drawdown of -43.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOM.TO and PINC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOM.TO | PINC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -43.84% | +34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.45% | -3.59% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.18% | -9.38% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.45% | -0.14% | -4.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -4.41% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | 0.93% | +0.55% |
Volatility
CCOM.TO vs. PINC.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund (PINC.TO) at 1.92%. This indicates that CCOM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PINC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCOM.TO | PINC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 1.92% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 5.06% | +3.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 6.48% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.42% | 8.58% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.42% | 14.91% | -6.49% |
Dividends
CCOM.TO vs. PINC.TO - Dividend Comparison
CCOM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than PINC.TO's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 7.35% | 3.48% | 6.99% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PINC.TO Purpose Multi-Asset Income Fund | 4.54% | 5.05% | 10.05% | 10.60% | 9.99% | 8.17% | 7.34% | 5.06% | 3.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCOM.TO and PINC.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CCOM.TO and PINC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer