CCLFX vs. IBIT
CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both funds - CCLFX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Cliffwater, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Over the past year, CCLFX returned 6.75% vs -43.69% for IBIT. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CCLFX charges 3.27%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCLFX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.17% return.
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 1Y
- 6.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.13%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.48%
IBIT
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -18.23%
- YTD
- -27.17%
- 1Y
- -43.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $1.33B | $1.34B | $1.65B |
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares | 3.28% | 8.93% | 12.09% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.17% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCLFX and IBIT is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCLFX vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
CCLFX
IBIT
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares (CCLFX) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCLFX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +19.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 6.72 | 0.84 | +5.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 35.94 | -0.82 | +36.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 197.36 | -1.26 | +198.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCLFX drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLFX and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCLFX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -53.30% | +49.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.19% | -53.30% | +53.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -49.28% | +49.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -18.29% | +18.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 34.80% | -34.77% |
Volatility
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares (CCLFX) is 0.20%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that CCLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCLFX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.20% | 8.98% | -8.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.63% | 33.79% | -33.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85% | 44.48% | -43.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 49.57% | -47.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.86% | 49.57% | -47.71% |
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCLFX has a 3.27% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
CCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.08%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund Class I Shares | 10.08% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCLFX and IBIT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to CCLFX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCLFX dropped -3.91% vs IBIT's -53.30%.
CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.10 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCLFX and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer