CCLFX vs. IBIT
CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both funds - CCLFX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Cliffwater, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Over the past year, CCLFX returned 7.28% vs -39.82% for IBIT. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCLFX charges 3.42%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCLFX achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.88% return.
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 2.84%
- 1Y
- 7.28%
- 3Y*
- 10.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -17.81%
- YTD
- -28.88%
- 6M
- -28.88%
- 1Y
- -39.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 2.63% | 8.93% | 12.09% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.88% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCLFX and IBIT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCLFX vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
CCLFX
IBIT
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCLFX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +9.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +21.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.15 | 0.86 | +6.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 38.74 | -0.77 | +39.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 212.77 | -1.30 | +214.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCLFX drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLFX and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCLFX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -52.11% | +48.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.19% | -52.11% | +51.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -50.47% | +50.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -16.85% | +16.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.03% | 30.58% | -30.55% |
Volatility
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) is 0.25%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that CCLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCLFX | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 13.18% | -12.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.66% | 34.64% | -33.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88% | 44.31% | -43.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 50.22% | -48.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.87% | 50.22% | -48.35% |
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCLFX has a 3.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCLFX vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
CCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.25%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.25% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CCLFX and IBIT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to CCLFX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCLFX dropped -3.91% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.40 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CCLFX and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer