CCLFX vs. FIJWX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CCLFX (Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund) and FIJWX (Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, CCLFX returned 8.73%/yr vs 4.54%/yr for FIJWX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCLFX charges 3.42%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FIJWX.

Performance

CCLFX vs. FIJWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) and Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z (FIJWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCLFX achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than FIJWX's 2.98% return.

CCLFX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 6M: 2.75%
• 1Y: 7.18%
• 3Y*: 10.40%
• 5Y*: 8.73%
• 10Y*: —

FIJWX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 6M: 3.49%
• 1Y: 8.64%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCLFX vs. FIJWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund	2.53%	8.93%	12.62%	12.66%	2.32%	10.38%	8.73%	2.12%
FIJWX Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z	2.98%	7.84%	8.30%	10.24%	-7.26%	2.86%	3.97%	3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CCLFX and FIJWX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019	0.13

Return for Risk

CCLFX vs. FIJWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCLFX

CCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 100
CCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

FIJWX

FIJWX Risk / Return Rank: 96
FIJWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FIJWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FIJWX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FIJWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FIJWX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCLFX vs. FIJWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) and Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z (FIJWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CCLFX	FIJWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.40	3.01	+5.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	19.83	5.68	+14.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.15	1.78	+5.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	38.73	5.27	+33.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	212.68	26.54	+186.14

CCLFX vs. FIJWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCLFX Sharpe Ratio is 8.40, which is higher than the FIJWX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCLFX and FIJWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CCLFX vs. FIJWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCLFX drawdown since its inception was -3.91%, smaller than the maximum FIJWX drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCLFX and FIJWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCLFX	FIJWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.91%	-16.77%	+12.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.19%	-1.67%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.46%	-3.18%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-2.25%	-9.28%	+7.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.22%	+0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-1.64%	+1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	0.33%	-0.30%

Volatility

CCLFX vs. FIJWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) is 0.24%, while Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z (FIJWX) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that CCLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIJWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCLFX	FIJWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.24%	0.88%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.66%	2.32%	-1.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88%	2.92%	-2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.73%	3.84%	-2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.87%	4.64%	-2.77%

CCLFX vs. FIJWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCLFX has a 3.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FIJWX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCLFX vs. FIJWX - Dividend Comparison

CCLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than FIJWX's 7.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund	10.26%	10.47%	11.27%	10.96%	3.96%	7.03%	6.90%	0.61%	0.00%
FIJWX Fidelity Advisor Short Duration High Income Fund Class Z	7.38%	7.45%	6.59%	6.04%	2.92%	2.93%	3.57%	4.30%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCLFX and FIJWX in my portfolio?

CCLFX and FIJWX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCLFX or FIJWX?

FIJWX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to CCLFX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCLFX dropped -3.91% vs FIJWX's -16.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.40 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.