PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCI vs. IBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCI vs. IBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crown Castle International Corp. (CCI) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCI achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than IBM's -2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CCI has underperformed IBM with an annualized return of 4.31%, while IBM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.


CCI

1D
0.75%
1M
4.33%
YTD
7.65%
6M
8.42%
1Y
-0.01%
3Y*
-0.45%
5Y*
-9.48%
10Y*
4.31%

IBM

1D
-5.61%
1M
23.97%
YTD
-2.58%
6M
-6.29%
1Y
8.65%
3Y*
33.23%
5Y*
19.70%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCI vs. IBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCI
Crown Castle International Corp.
7.65%2.96%-16.39%-10.24%-32.57%35.08%15.49%35.45%1.75%32.97%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
-2.58%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CCI and IBM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 1998

0.26

The correlation between CCI and IBM shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCI:

$41.29B

IBM:

$271.20B

EPS

CCI:

$2.42

IBM:

$11.32

PE Ratio

CCI:

38.99

IBM:

25.16

PS Ratio

CCI:

9.80

IBM:

3.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCI:

$4.21B

IBM:

$68.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCI:

$2.03B

IBM:

$40.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCI:

$2.15B

IBM:

$15.71B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCI vs. IBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCI
CCI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCI vs. IBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crown Castle International Corp. (CCI) and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCIIBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.09

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

0.31

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

0.67

-0.74

CCI vs. IBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the IBM Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCI and IBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCIIBMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

0.24

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.73

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.43

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.30

-0.09

Drawdowns

CCI vs. IBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCI drawdown since its inception was -97.52%, which is greater than IBM's maximum drawdown of -69.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCI and IBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCIIBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.52%

-69.40%

-28.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.01%

-30.96%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.77%

-30.96%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.48%

-30.96%

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.48%

-40.59%

-14.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.91%

-13.48%

-30.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.91%

-20.12%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.67%

14.20%

+3.47%

Volatility

CCI vs. IBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crown Castle International Corp. (CCI) is 8.70%, while International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a volatility of 21.74%. This indicates that CCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCIIBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

21.74%

-13.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.42%

34.56%

-12.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.80%

39.43%

-12.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.62%

27.14%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.97%

26.57%

-0.60%

Dividends

CCI vs. IBM - Dividend Comparison

CCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than IBM's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCI
Crown Castle International Corp.
4.50%5.35%6.90%5.43%4.41%2.62%3.10%3.22%3.94%3.51%4.15%3.87%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.36%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%

Financials

CCI vs. IBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crown Castle International Corp. and International Business Machines Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.01B
15.92B
(CCI) Total Revenue
(IBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCI vs. IBM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Crown Castle International Corp. and International Business Machines Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
56.2%
Portfolio components
CCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crown Castle International Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

IBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.

CCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crown Castle International Corp. reported an operating income of 465.00M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.0%.

IBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

CCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Crown Castle International Corp. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.

IBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCI and IBM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBM has higher volatility (21.74%) compared to CCI (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCI dropped -97.52% vs IBM's -69.40%.

IBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCI and IBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer