PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCH.L vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCH.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCH.L achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 15.40%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.


CCH.L

1D
1.00%
1M
1.39%
YTD
13.01%
6M
17.85%
1Y
10.81%
3Y*
24.32%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
15.40%

SPXP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.53%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.49%
1Y
29.25%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
16.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCH.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
13.01%43.89%22.12%20.07%-20.11%9.79%-4.81%12.76%3.22%38.99%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.53%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.90%26.76%0.26%10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CCH.L and SPXP.L is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between CCH.L and SPXP.L has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCH.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCH.L
CCH.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CCH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CCH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCH.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCH.LSPXP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.52

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

4.11

-3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

15.13

-13.88

CCH.L vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCH.L and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCH.LSPXP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.78

-2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

1.06

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

1.10

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.15

-0.77

Drawdowns

CCH.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCH.L and SPXP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCH.LSPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.45%

-25.46%

-22.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.05%

-7.09%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.05%

-20.77%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.54%

-20.77%

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.45%

-25.46%

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.48%

-0.21%

-10.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.56%

-3.50%

-11.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.65%

1.93%

+6.72%

Volatility

CCH.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that CCH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCH.LSPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

2.65%

+3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.67%

7.24%

+9.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

10.49%

+12.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.83%

14.23%

+9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.24%

16.22%

+10.02%

Dividends

CCH.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

CCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
2.45%2.32%2.94%2.93%3.11%2.17%2.26%8.67%1.91%1.57%1.95%2.15%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCH.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCH.L and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer