CCH.L vs. LRN
CCH.L (Coca Cola HBC AG) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — CCH.L in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic, LRN in Education & Training Services. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L returned 16.35%/yr vs 24.44%/yr for LRN. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CCH.L vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CCH.L is traded in GBp, while LRN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LRN values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCH.L achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 51.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CCH.L has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of 16.35%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 24.44% annualized return.
CCH.L
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 9.92%
- YTD
- 22.34%
- 6M
- 27.17%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
LRN
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 10.51%
- YTD
- 51.25%
- 6M
- 51.11%
- 1Y
- -30.94%
- 3Y*
- 31.20%
- 5Y*
- 27.58%
- 10Y*
- 24.44%
CCH.L vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 22.34% | 43.91% | 22.14% | 20.08% | -19.68% | 10.15% | -4.69% | 11.09% | 3.27% | 39.03% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 51.25% | -41.98% | 78.11% | 80.32% | 5.01% | 58.48% | 1.26% | -21.03% | 65.16% | -15.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCH.L and LRN is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
CCH.L:
£16.70B
LRN:
$4.65B
CCH.L:
€4.84
LRN:
$9.68
CCH.L:
10.98
LRN:
10.10
CCH.L:
0.61
LRN:
0.25
CCH.L:
0.86
LRN:
1.86
CCH.L:
5.03
LRN:
2.83
CCH.L:
€22.35B
LRN:
$2.54B
CCH.L:
€8.14B
LRN:
$972.24M
CCH.L:
€3.00B
LRN:
$424.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCH.L vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
CCH.L
LRN
CCH.L vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCH.L | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.98 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | -0.47 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.15 | -0.72 | +2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCH.L vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCH.L drawdown since its inception was -48.45%, smaller than the maximum LRN drawdown of -78.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCH.L and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCH.L | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.45% | -78.88% | +30.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.05% | -63.65% | +45.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.05% | -63.65% | +45.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.54% | -63.65% | +16.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.45% | -63.65% | +15.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -42.13% | +39.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -32.95% | +18.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 41.90% | -33.21% |
Volatility
CCH.L vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) is 5.17%, while Stride, Inc. (LRN) has a volatility of 8.08%. This indicates that CCH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCH.L | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 8.08% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 24.16% | -7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.83% | 66.67% | -43.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 51.80% | -27.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 49.76% | -23.56% |
Dividends
CCH.L vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
CCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, while LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.96% | 2.94% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 2.35% | 6.99% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.76% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CCH.L vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Coca Cola HBC AG and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CCH.L vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison
CCH.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 5.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CCH.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported an operating income of 654.01M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
CCH.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a net income of 469.16M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCH.L and LRN have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CCH.L and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer