CCCMX vs. MUC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CCCMX (Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund) and MUC (BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, CCCMX returned 1.47%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for MUC. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CCCMX charges 0.27%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for MUC.

Performance

CCCMX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCMX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CCCMX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 1.47%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.78% annualized return.

CCCMX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 6M: 0.91%
• 1Y: 4.92%
• 3Y*: 3.24%
• 5Y*: 1.13%
• 10Y*: 1.47%

MUC

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: 10.52%
• 3Y*: 6.28%
• 5Y*: -2.69%
• 10Y*: 0.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCMX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCCMX Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund	0.60%	4.69%	1.42%	3.46%	-4.27%	0.02%	3.81%	4.61%	1.70%	2.39%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	4.06%	5.96%	0.76%	7.86%	-26.81%	7.38%	11.85%	18.12%	-9.00%	6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CCCMX and MUC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2010	0.30

The correlation between CCCMX and MUC shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CCCMX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCCMX

CCCMX Risk / Return Rank: 64
CCCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CCCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CCCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CCCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CCCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

MUC

MUC Risk / Return Rank: 23
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCMX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CCCMX	MUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	1.31	+1.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.00	2.08	+1.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.77	1.25	+0.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.62	+0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.10	6.57	-0.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CCCMX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCCMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the MUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCCMX and MUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCCMX	MUC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	1.31	+1.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	-0.24	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.07	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.29	+0.33

Drawdowns

CCCMX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCMX drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, smaller than the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCMX and MUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCCMX	MUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.58%	-48.97%	+41.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.37%	-6.53%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.11%	-14.51%	+11.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.25%	-38.29%	+31.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.58%	-38.29%	+30.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-16.50%	+15.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-9.90%	+8.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	1.60%	-0.79%

Volatility

CCCMX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) is 0.67%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that CCCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CCCMX	MUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	2.37%	-1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.43%	6.24%	-4.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74%	8.05%	-6.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.32%	11.50%	-9.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.42%	11.89%	-9.47%

CCCMX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCMX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

CCCMX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

CCCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than MUC's 5.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCCMX Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund	2.56%	2.51%	2.39%	1.71%	1.11%	1.61%	2.35%	1.95%	1.97%	1.41%	0.00%	0.00%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	5.97%	6.06%	5.62%	3.84%	5.79%	4.27%	3.96%	3.90%	4.99%	5.14%	5.45%	5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCCMX and MUC in my portfolio?

CCCMX and MUC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CCCMX or MUC?

MUC has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to CCCMX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCCMX dropped -7.58% vs MUC's -48.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.