CCCMX vs. FSMUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX).
CCCMX is managed by Capital Group. It was launched on Apr 12, 2010. FSMUX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 24, 2021.
Performance
CCCMX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCCMX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCMX Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund | -0.84% | 4.69% | 1.42% | 3.46% | -4.27% | -0.12% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | -1.13% | 3.14% | 2.99% | 6.78% | -11.25% | 0.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCCMX achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's -1.13% return.
CCCMX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 2.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.92%
- 10Y*
- 1.36%
FSMUX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCCMX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCCMX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CCCMX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank
CCCMX
FSMUX
CCCMX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCCMX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.63 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 0.87 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.19 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.28 | +1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 0.78 | +4.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCCMX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.63 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | -0.00 | +0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCCMX and FSMUX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CCCMX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison
CCCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, which matches FSMUX's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCCMX Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund | 2.35% | 2.51% | 2.39% | 1.71% | 1.11% | 1.61% | 2.35% | 1.95% | 1.97% | 1.41% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 2.35% | 3.26% | 3.74% | 3.18% | 2.14% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CCCMX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCCMX drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCMX and FSMUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCCMX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -16.27% | +8.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | -5.30% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -2.56% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -5.61% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 1.96% | -1.19% |
Volatility
CCCMX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Capital Group California Core Municipal Fund (CCCMX) is 0.84%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that CCCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCCMX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 0.99% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.25% | 2.12% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93% | 6.65% | -3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.29% | 4.67% | -2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.41% | 4.67% | -2.26% |