PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCCC vs. MBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CCCC vs. MBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC) and MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCC achieves a 104.19% return, which is significantly higher than MBX's 12.59% return.


CCCC

1D
0.78%
1M
9.55%
YTD
104.19%
6M
57.89%
1Y
132.14%
3Y*
1.14%
5Y*
-37.89%
10Y*

MBX

1D
-4.67%
1M
9.43%
YTD
12.59%
6M
18.92%
1Y
242.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCC vs. MBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CCCC
C4 Therapeutics, Inc.
104.19%-46.94%-43.84%
MBX
MBX Biosciences, Inc
12.59%71.13%-19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CCCC and MBX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCCC:

$491.69M

MBX:

$1.65B

EPS

CCCC:

-$1.18

MBX:

-$2.30

PB Ratio

CCCC:

2.10

MBX:

3.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCCC:

$28.71M

MBX:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCCC:

$26.90M

MBX:

-$160.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

CCCC:

-$107.31M

MBX:

-$96.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCCC vs. MBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCCC
CCCC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MBX
MBX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCC vs. MBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC) and MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CCCCMBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

6.19

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

11.83

-6.57

CCCC vs. MBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the MBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCCC and MBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CCCC vs. MBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCC drawdown since its inception was -97.82%, which is greater than MBX's maximum drawdown of -77.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCC and MBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCCCMBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.82%

-77.71%

-20.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.10%

-37.60%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.28%

-17.69%

-74.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.94%

-34.85%

-37.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.88%

19.65%

+7.23%

Volatility

CCCC vs. MBX - Volatility Comparison

C4 Therapeutics, Inc. (CCCC) has a higher volatility of 29.92% compared to MBX Biosciences, Inc (MBX) at 24.53%. This indicates that CCCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCCCMBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.92%

24.53%

+5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.17%

60.13%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.41%

135.18%

-33.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.53%

119.14%

-1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.01%

119.14%

-6.13%

Dividends

CCCC vs. MBX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CCCC nor MBX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CCCC vs. MBX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between C4 Therapeutics, Inc. and MBX Biosciences, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M2022202320242025202600
(CCCC) Total Revenue
(MBX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CCCC and MBX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCCC has higher volatility (29.92%) compared to MBX (24.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCCC dropped -97.82% vs MBX's -77.71%.

MBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCCC and MBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer