CCCB.TO vs. NXF.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CCCB.TO (CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF) and NXF.TO (CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - CCCB.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by CIBC, while NXF.TO is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

CCCB.TO vs. NXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB.TO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCB.TO achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly lower than NXF.TO's 31.66% return.

CCCB.TO

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 15.74%
• 6M: 20.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NXF.TO

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -2.61%
• YTD: 31.66%
• 6M: 28.51%
• 1Y: 47.32%
• 3Y*: 15.61%
• 5Y*: 17.26%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCB.TO vs. NXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CCCB.TO CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF	15.74%	21.01%
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	31.66%	0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CCCB.TO and NXF.TO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

CCCB.TO vs. NXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXF.TO

NXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
NXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
NXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 67
NXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
NXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCB.TO vs. NXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB.TO) and CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged) (NXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CCCB.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.21	0.22	+4.00

Drawdowns

CCCB.TO vs. NXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCB.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.92%, smaller than the maximum NXF.TO drawdown of -65.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCB.TO and NXF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CCCB.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.92%	-65.25%	+57.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.41%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-5.56%	+4.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-16.04%	+15.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CCCB.TO	NXF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.56%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	19.53%	-6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.06%	23.39%	-10.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.06%	26.15%	-13.09%

Dividends

CCCB.TO vs. NXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

CCCB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than NXF.TO's 8.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCCB.TO CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF	3.97%	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NXF.TO CI Energy Giants Covered Call ETF Common Units (CAD Hedged)	8.09%	7.70%	8.50%	8.60%	11.22%	9.48%	11.23%	7.83%	9.38%	6.50%	8.24%	8.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CCCB.TO and NXF.TO in my portfolio?

CCCB.TO and NXF.TO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between CCCB.TO and NXF.TO?

CCCB.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while NXF.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: CIBC and CI.