PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB.TO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCCB.TO achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly lower than AVGY.TO's 25.75% return.


CCCB.TO

1D
1.24%
1M
2.28%
YTD
15.74%
6M
18.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVGY.TO

1D
-12.01%
1M
1.81%
YTD
25.75%
6M
10.03%
1Y
78.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CCCB.TO and AVGY.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCCB.TO

AVGY.TO
AVGY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AVGY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB.TO) and Harvest Broadcom Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (AVGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCCB.TOAVGY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.21

1.83

+2.38

Drawdowns

CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCCB.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.92%, smaller than the maximum AVGY.TO drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCCB.TO and AVGY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCCB.TOAVGY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-28.78%

+20.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-12.41%

+11.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-8.44%

+7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.31%

Volatility

CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCCB.TOAVGY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.06%

47.07%

-34.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

52.24%

-39.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.06%

52.24%

-39.18%

CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCB.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCCB.TO vs. AVGY.TO - Dividend Comparison

CCCB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than AVGY.TO's 21.68% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CCCB.TO and AVGY.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CCCB.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CCCB.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AVGY.TO.

They also come from different issuers: CIBC and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for CCCB.TO and 0.40% for AVGY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCCB.TO and AVGY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer