CCAU.L vs. IWDA.L
CCAU.L (iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CCAU.L is a Canada Equities fund tracking the MSCI Developed - Canada in USD - NET TR, while IWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CCAU.L returned 10.89%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for IWDA.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CCAU.L charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.L.
Performance
CCAU.L vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CCAU.L having a 9.97% return and IWDA.L slightly higher at 10.17%. Over the past 10 years, CCAU.L has underperformed IWDA.L with an annualized return of 10.89%, while IWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.
CCAU.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 30.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
IWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 1Y
- 22.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.87%
- 5Y*
- 11.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
CCAU.L vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCAU.L iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.97% | 36.70% | 12.06% | 14.22% | -12.45% | 24.37% | 5.95% | 26.28% | -17.42% | 15.44% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.17% | 21.03% | 19.11% | 24.27% | -18.11% | 22.19% | 16.06% | 27.13% | -9.01% | 22.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CCAU.L and IWDA.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2010 | 0.71 |
The correlation between CCAU.L and IWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CCAU.L vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CCAU.L
IWDA.L
CCAU.L vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CCAU.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CCAU.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.32 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 2.64 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.98 | 10.75 | +4.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CCAU.L vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCAU.L drawdown since its inception was -42.79%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCAU.L and IWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCAU.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.79% | -34.11% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -8.31% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.83% | -16.94% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.98% | -25.88% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.11% | -34.11% | -7.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.12% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -4.39% | -5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 2.04% | -0.02% |
Volatility
CCAU.L vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Canada UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CCAU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that CCAU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CCAU.L | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 2.72% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 9.80% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.23% | 12.26% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 15.73% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 15.78% | +2.20% |
CCAU.L vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCAU.L has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
CCAU.L vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CCAU.L nor IWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CCAU.L and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for CCAU.L.
CCAU.L is categorized as Canada Equities, while IWDA.L is Global Equities. CCAU.L tracks MSCI Developed - Canada in USD - NET TR, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.48% for CCAU.L and 0.20% for IWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for CCAU.L and IWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer