PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCALX vs. OBMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CCALX vs. OBMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class (CCALX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCALX achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than OBMCX's 43.75% return. Over the past 10 years, CCALX has underperformed OBMCX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while OBMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.47% annualized return.


CCALX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.83%
6M
0.01%
1Y
-3.22%
3Y*
2.24%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
9.37%

OBMCX

1D
-1.32%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
43.75%
6M
42.14%
1Y
74.23%
3Y*
29.19%
5Y*
19.33%
10Y*
21.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CCALX vs. OBMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCALX
Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class
1.83%-10.83%8.96%22.36%-28.16%16.25%30.59%25.42%0.79%28.72%
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
43.75%14.70%22.82%18.87%-10.57%53.20%29.91%21.94%-12.04%27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CCALX and OBMCX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.85

The correlation between CCALX and OBMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCALX vs. OBMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCALX
CCALX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CCALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCALX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CCALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCALX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

OBMCX
OBMCX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
OBMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
OBMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCALX vs. OBMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class (CCALX) and Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCALXOBMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.48

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

6.03

-6.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

24.24

-24.76

CCALX vs. OBMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCALX Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the OBMCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCALX and OBMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCALXOBMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

3.02

-3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.74

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.83

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.45

-0.01

Drawdowns

CCALX vs. OBMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCALX drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum OBMCX drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCALX and OBMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CCALXOBMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-68.24%

+30.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-12.45%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.69%

-28.11%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.06%

-28.11%

-9.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.06%

-50.04%

+11.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.54%

-1.32%

-16.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-16.42%

+6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

3.09%

+2.41%

Volatility

CCALX vs. OBMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class (CCALX) is 4.84%, while Oberweis Micro Cap Fund (OBMCX) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that CCALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OBMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CCALXOBMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

8.30%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

18.64%

-5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

24.93%

-6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.76%

26.21%

-4.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.50%

25.88%

-4.38%

CCALX vs. OBMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCALX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than OBMCX's 1.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

CCALX vs. OBMCX - Dividend Comparison

CCALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than OBMCX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCALX
Conestoga Small Cap Fund Institutional Class
5.33%5.43%0.00%0.84%4.04%5.18%0.00%2.11%1.45%5.59%1.18%1.87%
OBMCX
Oberweis Micro Cap Fund
0.98%1.41%2.53%0.00%1.37%24.35%0.00%0.00%19.67%11.76%0.05%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


CCALX and OBMCX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OBMCX has higher volatility (8.30%) compared to CCALX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CCALX dropped -38.06% vs OBMCX's -68.24%.

OBMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CCALX and OBMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer