CC1U.L vs. EUNN.DE
CC1U.L (Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD) and EUNN.DE (iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CC1U.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while EUNN.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan IMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CC1U.L returned 4.02%/yr vs 9.30%/yr for EUNN.DE. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CC1U.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUNN.DE.
Performance
CC1U.L vs. EUNN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CC1U.L is traded in USD, while EUNN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUNN.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CC1U.L achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than EUNN.DE's 15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CC1U.L has underperformed EUNN.DE with an annualized return of 4.02%, while EUNN.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.30% annualized return.
CC1U.L
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 31.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
EUNN.DE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 16.51%
- 1Y
- 32.43%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
CC1U.L vs. EUNN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC1U.L Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD | 0.83% | 39.49% | 1.53% | -11.33% | -9.32% | -3.10% | -1.85% | 12.90% | -14.42% | 29.16% |
EUNN.DE iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF | 15.19% | 28.09% | 6.45% | 18.80% | -16.35% | 0.63% | 14.27% | 19.66% | -14.54% | 26.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between CC1U.L and EUNN.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011 | 0.41 |
The correlation between CC1U.L and EUNN.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CC1U.L vs. EUNN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CC1U.L
EUNN.DE
CC1U.L vs. EUNN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CC1U.L | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 2.62 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 8.85 | -4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CC1U.L | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.66 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.50 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.55 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.43 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
CC1U.L vs. EUNN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CC1U.L drawdown since its inception was -51.06%, which is greater than EUNN.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CC1U.L and EUNN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CC1U.L | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.06% | -32.50% | -18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.29% | -12.33% | -3.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.24% | -13.96% | -25.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.08% | -32.50% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.06% | -32.50% | -18.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.25% | -0.15% | -10.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.27% | -8.41% | -13.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.32% | 3.65% | +3.67% |
Volatility
CC1U.L vs. EUNN.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF (EUNN.DE) at 3.60%. This indicates that CC1U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CC1U.L | EUNN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 3.60% | +4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 15.77% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.09% | 19.50% | +3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 17.45% | +9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 16.80% | +7.45% |
CC1U.L vs. EUNN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CC1U.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
CC1U.L vs. EUNN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CC1U.L nor EUNN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CC1U.L and EUNN.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CC1U.L.
CC1U.L is categorized as China Equities, while EUNN.DE is Japan Equities. CC1U.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while EUNN.DE tracks MSCI Japan IMI. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CC1U.L and 0.12% for EUNN.DE.
Find the right allocation for CC1U.L and EUNN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer