CC1U.L vs. DBXD.DE
CC1U.L (Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD) and DBXD.DE (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - CC1U.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while DBXD.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CC1U.L returned 4.02%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for DBXD.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CC1U.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DBXD.DE.
Performance
CC1U.L vs. DBXD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CC1U.L is traded in USD, while DBXD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DBXD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CC1U.L achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than DBXD.DE's 0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CC1U.L has underperformed DBXD.DE with an annualized return of 4.02%, while DBXD.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.
CC1U.L
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 31.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
DBXD.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 3.69%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
CC1U.L vs. DBXD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC1U.L Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD | 0.83% | 39.49% | 1.53% | -11.33% | -9.32% | -3.10% | -1.85% | 12.90% | -14.42% | 29.16% |
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 0.18% | 38.46% | 11.42% | 23.38% | -17.54% | 6.16% | 13.19% | 22.05% | -22.36% | 27.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between CC1U.L and DBXD.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011 | 0.44 |
The correlation between CC1U.L and DBXD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CC1U.L vs. DBXD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CC1U.L
DBXD.DE
CC1U.L vs. DBXD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CC1U.L | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.05 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 0.28 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 0.88 | +3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CC1U.L | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 0.23 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.39 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.44 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.21 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
CC1U.L vs. DBXD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CC1U.L drawdown since its inception was -51.06%, smaller than the maximum DBXD.DE drawdown of -61.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CC1U.L and DBXD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CC1U.L | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.06% | -61.23% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.29% | -14.36% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.24% | -15.91% | -23.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.08% | -39.52% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.06% | -45.51% | -5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.25% | -3.70% | -6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.27% | -15.20% | -7.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.32% | 4.57% | +2.75% |
Volatility
CC1U.L vs. DBXD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) at 5.59%. This indicates that CC1U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CC1U.L | DBXD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 5.59% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.58% | 14.43% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.09% | 17.66% | +5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.95% | 20.43% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.25% | 20.57% | +3.68% |
CC1U.L vs. DBXD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CC1U.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXD.DE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CC1U.L vs. DBXD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CC1U.L nor DBXD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CC1U.L and DBXD.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CC1U.L.
CC1U.L is categorized as China Equities, while DBXD.DE is Europe Equities. CC1U.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while DBXD.DE tracks DAX®. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CC1U.L and 0.09% for DBXD.DE.
Find the right allocation for CC1U.L and DBXD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer