PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBXY vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBXY vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBXY) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXY achieves a -4.51% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 11.52% return.


CBXY

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.59%
6M
-7.02%
YTD
-4.51%
1Y
-12.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAPR

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.53%
6M
10.92%
YTD
11.52%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXY vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBXY and BAPR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBXY vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXY
CBXY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CBXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBXY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CBXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBXY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBXY vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBXY) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBXYBAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.72

-0.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

9.24

-10.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

43.35

-44.47

CBXY vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBXY Sharpe Ratio is -1.33, which is lower than the BAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBXY and BAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBXY vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXY drawdown since its inception was -16.43%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXY and BAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBXYBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.43%

-23.91%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.43%

-1.93%

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.09%

-0.11%

-14.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-2.56%

-7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.44%

0.41%

+11.03%

Volatility

CBXY vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBXY) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 1.60%. This indicates that CBXY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBXYBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

1.60%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.84%

5.00%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

5.80%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.86%

11.51%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.86%

13.04%

-3.18%

CBXY vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBXY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBXY vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

CBXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBXY and BAPR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBXY has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to BAPR (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBXY dropped -16.43% vs BAPR's -23.91%.

On 1-year performance, BAPR leads with 17.78% vs -12.80% for CBXY. On fees, CBXY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 17.78% return vs -12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CBXY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BAPR.

CBXY has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.00% for BAPR.

CBXY tracks CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index, while BAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXY and 0.79% for BAPR.

BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs -1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBXY and BAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer