PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBXO vs. MMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBXO vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXO achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly lower than MMAX's 3.09% return.


CBXO

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.92%
YTD
-3.67%
6M
-5.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MMAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.60%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.75%
1Y
7.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXO vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBXO and MMAX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBXO vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXO

MMAX
MMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBXO vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBXO vs. MMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBXOMMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-2.36

3.13

-5.49

Drawdowns

CBXO vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXO drawdown since its inception was -11.40%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXO and MMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBXOMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.40%

-1.93%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.40%

-0.13%

-11.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-0.10%

-8.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

Volatility

CBXO vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBXOMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.23%

1.39%

+5.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

2.49%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.23%

2.49%

+4.74%

CBXO vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBXO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBXO vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison

CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than MMAX's 1.27% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBXO and MMAX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.

MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXO and 0.50% for MMAX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBXO and MMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer