CBXO vs. CPSA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) and CPSA (Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August) are both Defined Outcome funds from Calamos. CBXO is actively managed, while CPSA is passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CBXO vs. CPSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXO achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than CPSA's 2.88% return.

CBXO

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: -3.74%
• 6M: -4.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CPSA

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 2.88%
• 6M: 2.86%
• 1Y: 7.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXO vs. CPSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	-3.74%	-8.05%
CPSA Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August	2.88%	1.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CBXO and CPSA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

CBXO vs. CPSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CPSA

CPSA Risk / Return Rank: 95
CPSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CPSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CPSA Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CPSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CPSA Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBXO vs. CPSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBXO	CPSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.63	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.74	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.09	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	29.08	—

Drawdowns

CBXO vs. CPSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXO drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, which is greater than CPSA's maximum drawdown of -4.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXO and CPSA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBXO	CPSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.51%	-4.72%	-6.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.49%	-0.13%	-11.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.66%	-0.38%	-8.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBXO	CPSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.74%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.94%	2.23%	+4.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.94%	4.10%	+2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.94%	4.10%	+2.84%

CBXO vs. CPSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBXO and CPSA have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CBXO vs. CPSA - Dividend Comparison

CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while CPSA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	0.53%	0.51%
CPSA Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBXO and CPSA in my portfolio?

CBXO and CPSA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBXO or CPSA?

Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBXO or CPSA?

CBXO and CPSA have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBXO or CPSA?

CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for CPSA.