CBXL vs. QMAR
CBXL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both exchange-traded funds - CBXL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while QMAR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBXL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.
Performance
CBXL vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBXL achieves a -10.63% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 11.34% return.
CBXL
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -11.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMAR
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 11.78%
- 10Y*
- —
CBXL vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBXL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -10.63% | -9.21% |
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 11.34% | 2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBXL and QMAR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBXL vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank
CBXL
QMAR
CBXL vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBXL) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBXL | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -2.09 | 0.88 | -2.97 |
Drawdowns
CBXL vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBXL drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, roughly equal to the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXL and QMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBXL | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -19.83% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.49% | -1.70% | -17.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -3.28% | -8.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.46% | — |
Volatility
CBXL vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBXL | QMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 6.28% | +7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 13.98% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.41% | 13.86% | -0.45% |
CBXL vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBXL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBXL vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison
CBXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.59% | 1.42% |
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBXL and QMAR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBXL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.
CBXL has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.00% for QMAR.
CBXL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QMAR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CBXL and 0.90% for QMAR.
Find the right allocation for CBXL and QMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer