CBXJ vs. TKNQ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

CBXJ (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and TKNQ (Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF) are both Blockchain funds. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

CBXJ vs. TKNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) and Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF (TKNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBXJ achieves a -11.06% return, which is significantly lower than TKNQ's -9.00% return.

CBXJ

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: -14.41%
• YTD: -11.06%
• 1Y: -26.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TKNQ

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: 3.17%
• 6M: -13.28%
• YTD: -9.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBXJ vs. TKNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-11.06%	-1.36%
TKNQ Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF	-9.00%	-1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CBXJ and TKNQ is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

CBXJ vs. TKNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBXJ

CBXJ Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
CBXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
CBXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

TKNQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBXJ vs. TKNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) and Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF (TKNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBXJ	TKNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.51	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	—	—

Drawdowns

CBXJ vs. TKNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBXJ drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, which is greater than TKNQ's maximum drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXJ and TKNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBXJ	TKNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.16%	-21.83%	-8.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.76%	-15.26%	-13.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-12.85%	+0.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBXJ	TKNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.55%	29.00%	-11.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.25%	29.00%	-12.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.25%	29.00%	-12.75%

Dividends

CBXJ vs. TKNQ - Dividend Comparison

CBXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, while TKNQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	2.21%	1.97%
TKNQ Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBXJ and TKNQ in my portfolio?

CBXJ and TKNQ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBXJ or TKNQ?

CBXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.00% for TKNQ.

What is the main difference between CBXJ and TKNQ?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Amplify.