CBXJ vs. OWNB
CBXJ (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and OWNB (Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF) are both Blockchain funds. CBXJ is actively managed, while OWNB is passively managed. Over the past year, CBXJ returned -21.37% vs -34.38% for OWNB. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBXJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for OWNB.
Performance
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBXJ achieves a -11.67% return, which is significantly lower than OWNB's -9.32% return.
CBXJ
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -11.67%
- 6M
- -12.37%
- 1Y
- -21.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OWNB
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -9.32%
- 6M
- -15.24%
- 1Y
- -34.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | -11.67% | -3.27% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | -9.32% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBXJ and OWNB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CBXJ and OWNB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBXJ vs. OWNB — Risk / Return Rank
CBXJ
OWNB
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) and Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBXJ | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.93 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.58 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | -0.97 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBXJ drawdown since its inception was -29.25%, smaller than the maximum OWNB drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXJ and OWNB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBXJ | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.25% | -59.47% | +30.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.25% | -59.47% | +30.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.25% | -48.91% | +19.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -25.71% | +14.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.30% | 35.62% | -17.32% |
Volatility
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) is 3.06%, while Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) has a volatility of 15.85%. This indicates that CBXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OWNB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBXJ | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 15.85% | -12.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 43.46% | -32.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.78% | 58.05% | -40.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 62.38% | -45.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 62.38% | -45.89% |
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBXJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than OWNB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Dividend Comparison
CBXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than OWNB's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | 2.23% | 1.97% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | 0.96% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBXJ and OWNB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OWNB has higher volatility (15.85%) compared to CBXJ (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBXJ dropped -29.25% vs OWNB's -59.47%.
On 1-year performance, CBXJ leads with -21.37% vs -34.38% for OWNB. On fees, CBXJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CBXJ has performed better with a -21.37% return vs -34.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CBXJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for OWNB.
CBXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 0.96% for OWNB.
They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXJ and 0.85% for OWNB.
OWNB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.59 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBXJ and OWNB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer