CBXJ vs. OWNB
CBXJ (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and OWNB (Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF) are both Blockchain funds. CBXJ is actively managed, while OWNB is passively managed. Over the past year, CBXJ returned -26.44% vs -50.22% for OWNB. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBXJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for OWNB.
Performance
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBXJ achieves a -11.06% return, which is significantly higher than OWNB's -17.12% return.
CBXJ
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- YTD
- -11.06%
- 1Y
- -26.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OWNB
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -12.84%
- 6M
- -29.13%
- YTD
- -17.12%
- 1Y
- -50.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | -11.06% | -3.27% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | -17.12% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBXJ and OWNB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CBXJ and OWNB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBXJ vs. OWNB — Risk / Return Rank
CBXJ
OWNB
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) and Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBXJ | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 0.87 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.85 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | -1.33 | -0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBXJ drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum OWNB drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBXJ and OWNB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBXJ | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.16% | -59.47% | +29.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.16% | -59.47% | +29.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.76% | -53.30% | +24.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.03% | -26.85% | +14.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.57% | 37.75% | -18.18% |
Volatility
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ) is 2.56%, while Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF (OWNB) has a volatility of 15.01%. This indicates that CBXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OWNB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBXJ | OWNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 15.01% | -12.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 43.55% | -32.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.55% | 58.27% | -40.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 62.16% | -45.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 62.16% | -45.91% |
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBXJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than OWNB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBXJ vs. OWNB - Dividend Comparison
CBXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, more than OWNB's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | 2.21% | 1.97% |
OWNB Bitwise Bitcoin Standard Corporations ETF | 1.05% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBXJ and OWNB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OWNB has higher volatility (15.01%) compared to CBXJ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBXJ dropped -30.16% vs OWNB's -59.47%.
On 1-year performance, CBXJ leads with -26.44% vs -50.22% for OWNB. On fees, CBXJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBXJ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CBXJ has performed better with a -26.44% return vs -50.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CBXJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for OWNB.
CBXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.05% for OWNB.
They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBXJ and 0.85% for OWNB.
OWNB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBXJ and OWNB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer