PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc (FWEA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUX.DE achieves a 17.22% return, which is significantly higher than FWEA.DE's 10.39% return.


CBUX.DE

1D
0.64%
1M
4.98%
6M
14.67%
YTD
17.22%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
10Y*

FWEA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.53%
6M
8.32%
YTD
10.39%
1Y
21.37%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CBUX.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
17.22%0.75%14.53%1.74%
FWEA.DE
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc
10.39%17.53%19.21%8.62%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUX.DE and FWEA.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.21

The correlation between CBUX.DE and FWEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUX.DE
CBUX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CBUX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FWEA.DE
FWEA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FWEA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWEA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc (FWEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBUX.DEFWEA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

2.58

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.03

10.49

+0.54

CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FWEA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUX.DE and FWEA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUX.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, smaller than the maximum FWEA.DE drawdown of -17.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUX.DE and FWEA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUX.DEFWEA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.96%

-17.48%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.22%

-8.28%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.96%

-17.48%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.04%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-1.85%

-1.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.04%

-0.18%

Volatility

CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE) is 2.39%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF EUR PfHdg Acc (FWEA.DE) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that CBUX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUX.DEFWEA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

3.09%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

9.60%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.72%

12.00%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.93%

12.73%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.93%

12.73%

-0.80%

CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUX.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FWEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUX.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUX.DE nor FWEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUX.DE and FWEA.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FWEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CBUX.DE.

CBUX.DE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while FWEA.DE is Global Equities. CBUX.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index, while FWEA.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CBUX.DE and 0.20% for FWEA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUX.DE and FWEA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer