PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUT.DE achieves a 26.50% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.


CBUT.DE

1D
-3.41%
1M
2.84%
YTD
26.50%
6M
13.62%
1Y
59.61%
3Y*
44.53%
5Y*
10Y*

EUNA.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUT.DE
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
26.50%13.17%12.43%235.40%-36.41%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.46%2.79%1.60%4.36%1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUT.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUT.DE
CBUT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUT.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.06

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

0.43

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

1.18

+1.59

CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUT.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUT.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.34

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

-0.05

+0.72

Drawdowns

CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUT.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUT.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.95%

-17.79%

-36.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.09%

-2.75%

-40.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.95%

-4.02%

-49.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.86%

-8.66%

-6.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.96%

-6.76%

-13.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.75%

0.99%

+21.76%

Volatility

CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.16% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that CBUT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUT.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.16%

1.35%

+12.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.13%

2.82%

+33.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.55%

3.46%

+48.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.46%

4.64%

+55.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.46%

4.27%

+56.19%

CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUT.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUT.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUT.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUT.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBUT.DE.

CBUT.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. CBUT.DE tracks NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Capped, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBUT.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUT.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer