CBUT.DE vs. ETLH.DE
CBUT.DE (iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ETLH.DE (L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - CBUT.DE tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Capped while ETLH.DE tracks the Solactive eCommerce Logistics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUT.DE returned 44.53%/yr vs 5.96%/yr for ETLH.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUT.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ETLH.DE.
Performance
CBUT.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUT.DE achieves a 26.50% return, which is significantly higher than ETLH.DE's 0.49% return.
CBUT.DE
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 26.50%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 59.61%
- 3Y*
- 44.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLH.DE
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 5.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.34%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUT.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUT.DE iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 26.50% | 13.17% | 12.43% | 235.40% | -36.41% |
ETLH.DE L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF | 0.49% | -0.43% | 8.79% | 17.72% | 6.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUT.DE and ETLH.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUT.DE vs. ETLH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUT.DE
ETLH.DE
CBUT.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) and L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUT.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 0.37 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 0.96 | +1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUT.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 0.32 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.56 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
CBUT.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUT.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.95%, which is greater than ETLH.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUT.DE and ETLH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUT.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.95% | -27.60% | -26.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.09% | -12.61% | -30.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.95% | -25.70% | -28.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.86% | -7.50% | -7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -8.28% | -11.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.75% | 4.89% | +17.86% |
Volatility
CBUT.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Blockchain Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUT.DE) has a higher volatility of 14.16% compared to L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) at 4.00%. This indicates that CBUT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUT.DE | ETLH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.16% | 4.00% | +10.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.13% | 10.62% | +25.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.55% | 14.85% | +36.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.46% | 16.60% | +43.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.46% | 17.49% | +42.97% |
CBUT.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUT.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLH.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUT.DE vs. ETLH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUT.DE nor ETLH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUT.DE and ETLH.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLH.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLH.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CBUT.DE.
CBUT.DE tracks NYSE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Capped, while ETLH.DE tracks Solactive eCommerce Logistics. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CBUT.DE and 0.49% for ETLH.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUT.DE and ETLH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer