PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUN.DE
iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-5.06%9.37%36.98%46.88%-9.28%
XFNT.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-14.58%-1.22%40.05%24.41%-8.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUN.DE achieves a -5.06% return, which is significantly higher than XFNT.DE's -14.58% return.


CBUN.DE

1D
3.41%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
-5.06%
6M
-10.92%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
10Y*

XFNT.DE

1D
1.07%
1M
-3.74%
YTD
-14.58%
6M
-20.60%
1Y
-13.47%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUN.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XFNT.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUN.DE
CBUN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CBUN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XFNT.DE
XFNT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFNT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUN.DEXFNT.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

-0.63

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

-0.76

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.90

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

-0.58

+1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.03

-1.47

+2.50

CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the XFNT.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUN.DE and XFNT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUN.DEXFNT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

-0.63

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.42

+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between CBUN.DE and XFNT.DE is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUN.DE nor XFNT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUN.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.59%, roughly equal to the maximum XFNT.DE drawdown of -26.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUN.DE and XFNT.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUN.DEXFNT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.59%

-26.32%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.83%

-23.51%

+5.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.56%

-24.38%

+9.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-6.96%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.66%

9.23%

-1.57%

Volatility

CBUN.DE vs. XFNT.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Digital Entertainment and Education UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUN.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Fintech Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XFNT.DE) at 5.15%. This indicates that CBUN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFNT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CBUN.DEXFNT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

5.15%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.39%

13.06%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.61%

21.30%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

19.39%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

19.39%

+0.84%