PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUK.DE achieves a 2.62% return, which is significantly lower than XMOV.DE's 27.31% return.


CBUK.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
4.25%
YTD
2.62%
6M
0.39%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
10Y*

XMOV.DE

1D
-2.17%
1M
6.38%
YTD
27.31%
6M
25.09%
1Y
51.20%
3Y*
24.46%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBUK.DE
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc
2.62%21.05%18.05%-9.04%-1.49%
XMOV.DE
Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF
27.31%14.79%20.92%46.97%-16.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUK.DE and XMOV.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.46

The correlation between CBUK.DE and XMOV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUK.DE
CBUK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XMOV.DE
XMOV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMOV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUK.DEXMOV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.45

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

4.71

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.88

17.12

-15.24

CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the XMOV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUK.DE and XMOV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUK.DEXMOV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

2.57

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.76

-0.55

Drawdowns

CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, which is greater than XMOV.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUK.DE and XMOV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUK.DEXMOV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-34.78%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.99%

-10.87%

-13.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

-24.70%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.37%

-2.17%

-9.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.27%

-7.53%

-8.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.77%

3.00%

+8.77%

Volatility

CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) and Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) have volatilities of 8.51% and 8.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUK.DEXMOV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.51%

8.84%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.60%

15.94%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.47%

19.94%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.52%

19.34%

+12.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.52%

20.77%

+10.75%

CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUK.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XMOV.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUK.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUK.DE nor XMOV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUK.DE and XMOV.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMOV.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMOV.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CBUK.DE.

CBUK.DE tracks MSCI China Technology Sub-Industries ESG Screened Select Capped, while XMOV.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Future Mobility. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CBUK.DE and 0.35% for XMOV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUK.DE and XMOV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer