CBUH.DE vs. ASRW.DE
CBUH.DE (iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ASRW.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUH.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select, while ASRW.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBUH.DE returned 22.30%/yr vs 17.25%/yr for ASRW.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBUH.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ASRW.DE.
Performance
CBUH.DE vs. ASRW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CBUH.DE is traded in EUR, while ASRW.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASRW.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUH.DE achieves a 22.41% return, which is significantly higher than ASRW.DE's 10.66% return.
CBUH.DE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 22.41%
- 6M
- 23.42%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASRW.DE
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 23.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUH.DE vs. ASRW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUH.DE iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 22.41% | 7.97% | 28.91% | 13.46% | -0.56% |
ASRW.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.67% | 6.97% | 25.41% | 18.13% | -2.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUH.DE and ASRW.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2022 | 0.77 |
The correlation between CBUH.DE and ASRW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUH.DE vs. ASRW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUH.DE
ASRW.DE
CBUH.DE vs. ASRW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUH.DE | ASRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 3.51 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 13.26 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUH.DE | ASRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 1.90 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.14 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
CBUH.DE vs. ASRW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUH.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.61%, which is greater than ASRW.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUH.DE and ASRW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUH.DE | ASRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.61% | -20.77% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -6.67% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | -20.77% | -1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.32% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.55% | -2.67% | -5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 1.77% | +0.50% |
Volatility
CBUH.DE vs. ASRW.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to BNP Paribas Easy MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF USD Acc (ASRW.DE) at 3.15%. This indicates that CBUH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUH.DE | ASRW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 3.15% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.32% | 9.06% | +4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 12.31% | +3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 13.66% | +3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 13.66% | +3.25% |
CBUH.DE vs. ASRW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUH.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ASRW.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUH.DE vs. ASRW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBUH.DE nor ASRW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUH.DE and ASRW.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASRW.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CBUH.DE.
CBUH.DE is categorized as Momentum, while ASRW.DE is Global Equities. CBUH.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select, while ASRW.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Filtered Min TE. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CBUH.DE and 0.15% for ASRW.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUH.DE and ASRW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer