PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUG.DE achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.


CBUG.DE

1D
0.52%
1M
2.87%
YTD
14.43%
6M
15.29%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
10Y*

EUNA.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.46%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
2.28%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CBUG.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)
14.43%6.47%13.17%11.34%-14.17%2.96%
EUNA.DE
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.46%2.79%1.60%4.36%-13.52%-0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUG.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021

0.18

The correlation between CBUG.DE and EUNA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUG.DE
CBUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNA.DE
EUNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUG.DEEUNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.06

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

0.43

+3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.66

1.18

+13.48

CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the EUNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUG.DE and EUNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUG.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

0.34

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

-0.05

+0.47

Drawdowns

CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUG.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.59%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUG.DE and EUNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUG.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.59%

-17.79%

-6.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-2.75%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

-4.02%

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.66%

+8.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-6.76%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.99%

+0.95%

Volatility

CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.41% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that CBUG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUG.DEEUNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

1.35%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

2.82%

+6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.90%

3.46%

+10.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

4.64%

+12.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

4.27%

+12.44%

CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBUG.DE and EUNA.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBUG.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBUG.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUG.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUG.DE and EUNA.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

CBUG.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUG.DE and EUNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer