CBUF.DE vs. NQSE.DE
CBUF.DE (iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist) and NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBUF.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while NQSE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CBUF.DE returned 4.66%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for NQSE.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBUF.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for NQSE.DE.
Performance
CBUF.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBUF.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 17.82% return.
CBUF.DE
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 3.91%
- YTD
- -2.22%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 7.40%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- —
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUF.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | -2.22% | 2.56% | 0.75% | 0.33% | 2.09% | 30.42% | 2.79% | 11.42% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.82% | 18.16% | 24.07% | 52.10% | -36.29% | 27.37% | 45.23% | 10.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBUF.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CBUF.DE and NQSE.DE has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBUF.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBUF.DE
NQSE.DE
CBUF.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBUF.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.39 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 3.08 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.56 | 10.77 | -9.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBUF.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 2.28 | -1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.71 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.82 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
CBUF.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBUF.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUF.DE and NQSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBUF.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.94% | -37.67% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -11.87% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.76% | -22.40% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -37.67% | +15.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.66% | -0.84% | -8.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -8.56% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 3.40% | +1.34% |
Volatility
CBUF.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) have volatilities of 4.98% and 4.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBUF.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 4.75% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 11.99% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 16.05% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 20.91% | -7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 21.54% | -6.18% |
CBUF.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBUF.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBUF.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while NQSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBUF.DE iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.08% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.09% | 1.05% | 1.27% | 0.10% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBUF.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
CBUF.DE is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CBUF.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBUF.DE and NQSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer