PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (NBTK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBUF.DE achieves a -2.22% return, which is significantly lower than NBTK.DE's 4.27% return.


CBUF.DE

1D
2.74%
1M
3.91%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
0.62%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*

NBTK.DE

1D
2.92%
1M
0.38%
YTD
4.27%
6M
3.76%
1Y
39.20%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
-2.22%2.56%0.75%0.33%2.09%30.42%2.79%11.42%
NBTK.DE
Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF
4.27%18.60%4.57%2.51%-6.11%7.46%14.59%14.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CBUF.DE and NBTK.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.70

The correlation between CBUF.DE and NBTK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBUF.DE
CBUF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

NBTK.DE
NBTK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NBTK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBTK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBTK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NBTK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBTK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (NBTK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBUF.DENBTK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.34

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

6.16

-5.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

17.06

-15.50

CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBUF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the NBTK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBUF.DE and NBTK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBUF.DENBTK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

2.03

-1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.27

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.42

+0.02

Drawdowns

CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBUF.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, smaller than the maximum NBTK.DE drawdown of -30.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBUF.DE and NBTK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBUF.DENBTK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.94%

-30.99%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-6.24%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.76%

-29.35%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-30.99%

+9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.66%

-1.44%

-8.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-10.62%

+4.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.74%

2.26%

+2.48%

Volatility

CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (CBUF.DE) is 4.98%, while Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF (NBTK.DE) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that CBUF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBTK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBUF.DENBTK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

6.41%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

14.11%

-4.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

19.00%

-5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

20.30%

-6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

22.05%

-6.69%

CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBUF.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NBTK.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBUF.DE vs. NBTK.DE - Dividend Comparison

CBUF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while NBTK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CBUF.DE
iShares MSCI World Health Care Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.08%1.06%1.02%1.16%1.09%1.05%1.27%0.10%
NBTK.DE
Invesco Nasdaq Biotech UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBUF.DE and NBTK.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUF.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUF.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for NBTK.DE.

CBUF.DE tracks MSCI World Health Care ESG Reduced Carbon Select 20 35 Capped, while NBTK.DE tracks Nasdaq Biotechnology. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for CBUF.DE and 0.40% for NBTK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBUF.DE and NBTK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer